International panel calls for a conservative approach 
on using genetic testing to evaluate, diagnose mental health 
conditions. 
While it struggled to reach consensus on key issues, an 
expert panel that revised guidelines on psychiatry-related genetic tests 
recommended pharmacogenetic testing as a support tool in guiding clinical care 
decisions and stressed the importance of communicating incidental findings of 
genomewide testing in a clear and transparent manner.
More than 50 
international experts from psychiatry, genetics, precision medicine, and other 
fields reviewed the latest scientific evidence on molecular genetic 
technologies, pharmacogenetics, and ethical issues to come up with eight 
recommendations on using genetics to diagnose and treat mental disorders. This 
represents the first thorough revision of the International Society of 
Psychiatric Genetics’ (ISPG) 2014 guidelines.
On their own, common genetic 
variants do not lead to depression, bipolar disorder, substance dependence, or 
schizophrenia, the expert panel determined. “Genotypes from large numbers of 
common variants can be combined to produce an overall genetic risk score, which 
can identify individuals at higher or lower risk, but at present it is not clear 
that this has clinical value,” the experts summarized.
The panel couldn’t 
agree on whether genetic tests should be used on a broad scale to help 
clinicians choose the best course of treatment for patients with mental illness. 
However, the group made some recommendations on pharmacogenetic tests. 
Pharmacogenetic-based drug therapies for psychiatric purposes at a minimum call 
for the availability of genetic information for the genes encoding enzymes 
CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 and genes HLA-A and HLA-B. When considering drugs such as 
carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine, the panel recommended that clinicians conduct 
HLA-A and HLA-Btesting to identify patients at risk for developing rare but 
serious side effects to these drugs.
“Evidence to support widespread use of 
other pharmacogenetic tests at this time is still inconclusive, but when 
pharmacogenetic testing results are already available, providers are encouraged 
to integrate this information into their medication selection and dosing 
decisions,” the panel indicated. Regarding CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 enzymes, such 
genetic information would provide the most benefit to patients who have had poor 
responses to a previous antidepressant or antipsychotic trial.
The panel also 
called for clarity and transparency in reporting incidental findings of 
genomewide testing. “Procedures for dealing with such findings should be made 
explicit and should be agreed with the patient or study participant in advance. 
The autonomy of competent individuals regarding preferences for notification of 
incidental findings should be respected,” it specified. The experts also 
recommended that professionals with mental health and genetic test expertise 
offer counseling to patients who undergo diagnostic or genomewide genetic 
testing.
Whether copy number variants, or CNV, testing should be widely used 
in adult-onset mental disorders was another topic of disagreement among the 
panelists. CNVs aren’t that common in adults, yet some experts believe that 
identifying certain CNVs in adults with severe conditions such as schizophrenia 
could assist patients and families in processing a diagnosis.
More education 
and research is needed to frame this debate and provide clarity on genetic 
testing’s role in psychiatric care, the panel determined.
The guidelines aim 
to help nonspecialist clinicians who face increasing requests for clinical 
genetic tests by patients and families but find it daunting to evaluate such 
tests. This is a “commitment to provide meaningful guidance to healthcare 
providers who urgently need it to treat their patients in the best possible 
ways,” ISPG President Thomas G. Schulze, MD, professor of psychiatry at the 
University of Munich, said in a statement. While clinicians should take 
advantage of the advancing field of psychiatric genetics, Schulze cautioned that 
“we should not succumb to overly optimistic claims.”