Have policymakers learned the right 
lessons from recent pandemics?
In the summer of 2004, several 
passengers aboard a cruise ship in Alaska developed gastrointestinal illness 
that was later linked to Vibrio parahaemolyticus from the fresh, local oysters 
they ate on board. It was the first known outbreak of V. parahaemolyticus that 
far north in Alaska, and health authorities noted that climate trends were a 
likely culprit. The median summer temperature of Prince William Sound had been 
rising each year, and in 2004 it had just surpassed 15 degrees Celsius, the 
minimum temperature required for V. parahaemolyticus to thrive. This is just one 
example of how infectious disease patterns are evolving as climate changes cause 
warmer, longer summers and more extreme weather events. 
Already Lyme disease 
has spread into Canada to places where the summers used to be too short and cool 
for the disease to establish itself. Further south, the Aedes aegypti mosquito 
has expanded its range, carrying diseases such as Zika, dengue fever, and 
chikungunya to new locations in the United States. In fact, cases of disease 
from mosquito, tick, and flea bites have tripled in the U.S. since 2004, 
according to a report from the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention.
“We’ve seen a number of instances where particular infectious 
diseases are changing their range,” said Kristie L. Ebi, PhD, MPH, MS, a 
professor of global health and of environmental and occupational health sciences 
at the University of Washington in Seattle. “We’re seeing diseases well outside 
of where you would expect them, in months when you won’t expect them, at levels 
of intensity that you wouldn’t expect.”
CLINICAL 
LABORATORIANS ON THE FRONT LINES
As climate change continues, 
clinical laboratorians should expect to be on the front lines whenever a new 
infectious disease occurs in an unexpected place, Ebi emphasized. “It’s 
critically important for laboratorians and others to be aware of these 
possibilities so that they take them into account when they’re trying to figure 
out, ‘What’s the diagnosis here? What should I look for? What should I 
analyze?’” she said.
Predicting exactly how climate change will affect 
infectious diseases is not easy, however. For years there has been speculation 
that warming due to climate change could increase malaria transmission, said 
Laurence Slutsker, MD, MPH, program leader for malaria and neglected tropical 
diseases at PATH, an international health organization based in Seattle. 
Warmer temperatures are known to speed the development of malaria parasites 
within mosquitos, while also increasing mosquito activity and biting 
patterns.
Yet so far there is little evidence that climate change has had a 
noticeable impact on malaria, aside from a few documented cases occurring at 
higher altitudes, Slutsker noted. “As a general trend, I think we would say that 
we don’t see large-scale effects at this point,” he said. Clinical laboratories 
have played a critical role in providing that evidence, Slutsker added. With the 
advent of rapid diagnostic tests for malaria, scientists now have improved 
surveillance data, especially in the developing world.
“Over the last decade 
we’ve done a much better job in the malaria community of trying to link a 
diagnosis of malaria to an actual laboratory test, aided in particular by the 
development of rapid diagnostic tests,” Slutsker said. “We’re in a much better 
position with laboratory-confirmed diagnosis to be able to really begin to track 
these trends over the long term.”
The fact that there has not yet been a 
climate-related increase in malaria speaks to the complexities of climate 
change. Perhaps climate change has caused some places to become so warm or dry 
that mosquito breeding opportunities have decreased, Slutsker said. It’s also 
possible that climate change effects have been dwarfed by the success of malaria 
prevention and treatment programs.
“There has been a massive scale of control 
efforts over the last decade,” he said, “and so anything that might have been 
seen in terms of an extension in the range of where malaria is transmitted or a 
general increase in the intensity of transmission in certain places due to 
climate change, might have been more difficult to observe in the context of 
overall decreasing incidence over the last decade.”
Meanwhile, there are 
other factors besides climate change driving the spread of infectious diseases 
to new locations, such as globalization and urbanization, said Albert Icksang 
Ko, MD, professor and department chair of epidemiology and microbial diseases 
and of medicine at the Yale School of Public Health in New Haven, 
Connecticut.
Certainly, higher temperatures and more extreme weather events 
will impact the range and intensity of infectious diseases, Ko said, but it’s 
not clear exactly where and how. “I think it’s fair to say that there’s going to 
be a large degree of uncertainty about how fast this is going to happen and how 
it’s going to play out,” Ko said.
In addition to direct effects of climate on 
infectious diseases, there are also indirect effects, he said. For example, if 
traditional farming regions in the United States become unsuitable for farming, 
the country may need to import more food from other countries, thus increasing 
the chances of introducing new infectious diseases.
Likewise, Ebi said, while 
dry weather caused by climate change may reduce mosquito breeding grounds, it 
may also cause people to harvest rainwater, which creates new breeding grounds 
for mosquitos. Wetter weather can increase mosquito breeding areas, but heavy 
rains can wash away breeding grounds and shift the highest mosquito populations 
to later in the season.
TOUGH QUESTIONS ON PREPAREDNESS, 
RESPONSE
Douglas E. Norris, PhD, professor at Johns Hopkins 
Bloomberg School of Public Health, agreed that it’s hard to predict the impact 
of climate change on disease patterns. “There are lots of things that could 
happen,” Norris said. “And they will happen. It’s hard to know whether we’ll be 
ready for it.”
Funding for surveillance programs is inconsistent and subject 
to political whim, Norris emphasized. When West Nile virus arrived in New York 
in 1999, for example, there was a public outcry over lapsed mosquito 
surveillance and a brief surge in new funding. “Now we’re talking almost 20 
years later, Zika comes in and everybody looks and says, ‘Well, why are we not 
ready for this?’ and we say, ‘Well, because we let all those programs die again. 
We didn’t learn our lesson,’” Norris said.
In addition to better 
surveillance, one of the most important ways to prepare for changing infectious 
disease patterns due to climate change is to strengthen our health systems 
overall, according to Ebi. Clinical laboratory professionals can help by working 
to improve communication among hospitals and with local health authorities, so 
they know what new pathogens such as Lyme disease or Zika or V. parahaemolyticus 
may be arriving in their area, she said. She would also like to see more funding 
and support for data-driven disease prediction systems that can be used to 
target surveillance and prevention measures. “There’s an enormous potential for 
promoting and protecting population health right now using early warning 
systems,” Ebi commented.
In the meantime, clinical laboratory professionals 
will continue to be part of the teams that first alert the public to the arrival 
of new infections that are the direct or indirect result of climate change, Ko 
noted. “Traditionally our surveillance has always relied on astute clinicians, 
nurses, health practitioners, and laboratory diagnosticians,” he 
said.
Clinical laboratories will also play a role in developing real-time 
surveillance systems and the rapid point-of-care tests that will inform these 
systems. “I think there is an extremely important role for people working in 
clinical laboratories in that sense,” Ko added. “I think it requires both the 
laboratory—including of course astute healthcare professionals who will send 
samples to the lab—but it also is the surveillance systems and how we can make 
them more robust to identify these emerging infections earlier.”