WHAT IS THE CLINICAL NEED FOR PREECLAMPSIA (PE) 
SCREENING?
A: PE affects about 2% of pregnancies globally and is a 
major cause of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. This condition 
has two major subtypes: early-onset (or preterm) PE, which develops before 34 
weeks of gestation, and late-onset PE, which occurs at or after the 34-week 
mark. Currently, the standard diagnostic indicator for both PE types is the 
presence of hypertension and proteinuria, but these clinical criteria alone may 
not adequately predict adverse outcomes.
While early-onset PE is the less 
prevalent subtype, it is associated with an even greater risk of adverse 
outcomes than late-onset PE. Developing an effective method for early 
identification of pregnancies at high risk for preterm PE is therefore one of 
the major challenges of modern obstetrics.
CURRENTLY, WHAT ARE THE 
MOST PROMISING BIOMARKERS FOR PE SCREENING AND DIAGNOSIS?
While the 
exact cause of PE is unknown, impaired placentation—i.e. a placenta that doesn’t 
function properly—is thought to be the condition’s underlying mechanism. This 
theory is supported by the finding that women with PE have abnormal blood flow 
in their uterine arteries and reduced maternal serum levels of placental 
products. In light of this, it is not surprising that placental growth factor 
(PlGF) is the most discriminating biomarker for PE—and for early-onset PE in 
particular—that researchers have found to date. PlGF levels are significantly 
lower in pregnant women who go on to develop PE, and researchers have used PlGF 
combined with other factors to achieve a 93% detection rate for the risk of 
developing PE in the first trimester, with a false-positive ratio of 5%. The 
other factors included maternal history, prior and family history of PE, 
maternal blood pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index, and 
pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A).
The antiangiogenic factor 
soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) and the sFlt-1:PlGF ratio have also 
shown promise in clinical research as biomarkers for predicting and diagnosing 
PE in the second and third trimester.
WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES OF 
USING THE SFLT-1:PLGF RATIO TO DETECT PE?
Starting in mid-pregnancy, 
healthcare providers can confirm a diagnosis of PE by measuring the levels of 
sFlt-1 and PlGF in maternal serum. Because women with PE have a significantly 
higher sFlt-1:PlGF ratio than women with other hypertensive disorders, this 
ratio enables providers to distinguish between patients who will develop PE and 
those with chronic or gestational hypertension. The sFlt-1:PlGF ratio has 
superior diagnostic power compared to either of these biomarkers alone, and 
several studies show that this ratio is highly predictive for ruling out PE, 
with a negative predictive value close to 99%. The sFlt-1:PlGF ratio combined 
with Doppler ultrasound measurements also has increased sensitivity and 
specificity for PE compared with a Doppler ultrasound by itself.
However, the 
ratio’s positive predictive value is < 37%, which is quite low. An ideal 
biomarker for preeclampsia should have a high positive predictive value in 
addition to a high negative predictive value. Further research is therefore 
needed in this area.
SO WHAT SHOULD LABS USE TO DETECT 
PREECLAMPSIA?
First-trimester maternal serum levels of PlGF and 
PAPP-A along with other maternal factors form a suitable panel for predicting 
the development of PE. For women in their second and third trimesters, labs 
should then measure maternal serum concentrations of sFlt-1 and PlGF to 
differentiate healthy women from women with PE. A high sFlt-1:PlGF ratio and a 
rapid elevation in the sFlt-1:PlGF ratio are associated with significantly 
increased risk for an immediate delivery.
Overall, the earlier labs identify 
a woman at high risk for PE, the better the chances are of improving her 
pregnancy’s outcome. Once a high-risk patient is identified, she can undergo 
intensive maternal and fetal monitoring, which in turn could lead to earlier 
diagnosis of PE while also preventing serious complications through timely 
pharmacological interventions.