Review of latest monitors, insulin delivery systems
recommends specific glucose management metrics, identifies best practices for
maintaining optimal glycemia levels.
Under the right
circumstances, self-monitoring with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can
inform care for patients on intense insulin regimens. The American Diabetes
Association (ADA) made this key recommendation and others regarding CGM and
automated insulin delivery systems in an update to its Standards of Medical
Care.
Developed by ADA’s Professional Practice Committee, the revised
recommendations in the Annals of Internal Medicine reflect new clinical evidence
as well as feedback from the clinical community on devices, hardware, and
software that individuals living with diabetes use to help manage blood glucose
levels. “As technology surrounding continuous glucose monitoring evolves, CGM
has the opportunity to positively impact the future of diabetes care and
research, and establishing standard, official time-in-range recommendations is
necessary for the clinical care, regulatory oversight, and research efforts
related to CGM,” William T. Cefalu, MD ADA’s chief scientific, medical, and
mission officer, said in a statement.
The update contains new language in the
guidance’s section on diabetes technology.
For patients undergoing intensive
insulin regimens such as insulin pump therapy or multiple daily injections, ADA
outlines when self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) or CGM should take place.
Specifically, patients should assess their glucose levels before certain
activities such as meals and snacks, driving, at bedtime, or exercising.
Monitoring might also occur postprandially on occasion or when patients suspect
they have low blood glucose. Individuals with diabetes also should do an
assessment after treating low blood glucose until glycemic levels return to
normal. SMBG or CGM “is most important for insulin-treated patients because it
enables them to adjust therapy to minimize hypoglycemia and manage
hyperglycemia,” wrote the authors, citing an observational study that showed an
association between lower HbA1c levels and higher daily occurrence of SMBG among
27,000 youths.
SMBG may also help inform and educate patients who have
infrequent insulin injections, the guidance authors offered.
Adult patients
requiring constant glucose testing could use an intermittently scanned CGM as a
substitute for SMBG, although this was only a “C” rated recommendation.
ADA
also gave the green light on certain CGM and automated insulin delivery devices
across age groups.
“Sensor-augmented pump therapy can be considered for
children, adolescents, and adults to improve glycemic control without increasing
overall or severe hypoglycemia,” the authors wrote of CGM devices.
The panel
recommends the following glucose management metrics:
Average glucose
level;
Percentage of time in hypoglycemia ranges <3.00 mmol/L [<54
mg/dL] and 3.00 to 3.89 mmol/L [54 to 70 mg/dL]);
Percentage of time in the
target range (3.89 to 10.0 mmol/L [70 to 180 mg/dL]); and
Percentage of time
in the hyperglycemia range (>10.0 mmol/L [>180 mg/dL]).
ADA also made
some recommendations on real-time CGM in adults. “When used properly, real-time
CGM in conjunction with intensive insulin regimens is a useful tool to lower
HbA1c levels in adults with type 1 diabetes who are not meeting glycemic
targets,” the panelists indicated. It may also serve as a useful tool in
individuals experiencing frequent hypoglycemic episodes or who aren’t aware that
they are experiencing hypoglycemia.
Patients should conduct real-time CGM at
least once a day to derive the most benefit from the technology.
To prevent
hypoglycemia episodes in adults with type 1 diabetes, the authors suggested
using a sensor-augmented pump therapy with automatic low-glucose suspend.
Approved by the Food and Drug Administration, this technology can “suspend basal
insulin when glucose is currently low or predicted to decrease below 3.89 mmol/L
(70 mg/dL) in the next 30 minutes,” they summarized.
The panel also
recommended automated insulin delivery systems for managing glycemia in children
age 7 or older, and in adults. According to the authors, “recent studies suggest
that these systems may have psychosocial benefits and may reduce
exercise-induced hypoglycemia.”