Renal function patterns matter when it comes to mortality in cirrhosis patients awaiting liver transplant.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) alone, or in combination with chronic 
kidney disease (CK), significantly increases mortality risk in cirrhotic 
patients waiting for a liver transplant. A study published in Clinical 
Gastroenterology and Hepatology underscores the importance of assessing renal 
function patterns to improve risk profiles in these patients, setting the stage 
to investigate more efficient biomarkers on kidney injury.
Half of all 
patients with cirrhosis that develop renal failure die within 30 days. “However, 
renal dysfunction in the context of cirrhosis arises from a broad spectrum of 
pathologies,” including AKI or CKD. Whether these two conditions affect survival 
equally, is not well known, wrote the investigators.
The researchers sought 
answers in a 90-day retrospective study of more than 22,000 adult patients on 
the liver transplant list with the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ 
Procurement and Transplantation Network. On average, these patients had spent 
approximately 1.6 years on the transplantation list and about 5 years 
participating in renal function assessments.
The investigators assigned 
patients to four groups based on the following renal function patterns:
AKI: 
an increase in serum creatinine by ≥0.3 mg/dL or ≥50% in the last 7 days or 
<72 days of hemodialysis;
CKD: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 
<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for 90 days with final eGFR of ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or ≥72 
days of hemodialysis;
AKI on CKD: meeting both AKI and CKD definitions; 
and
7 Normal renal function: meeting neither definition.
Patients’ serum 
creatinine and eGFR had been tracked serially while they were on the time the 
transplant list. The researchers used the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology 
Collaboration creatinine-based (CKD-EPIcr) equation to calculate eGFR. This 
formula was chosen because “some cirrhosis literature shows that it most closely 
approximates GFR in patients with liver disease,” lead study author Giuseppe 
Cullaro, MD, MAS, a transplant hepatology fellow at New York Presbyterian 
Hospital, told CLN Stat.
To establish any associations between transplant 
waitlist mortality and renal dysfunction, the investigators performed competing 
risk analyses, adjusting for confounders using the model for end-stage liver 
disease sodium (MELD-Na) scores. Among 22,680 patients on the waitlist, 13% and 
31% had episodes of AKI and CKD, respectively. About 29% either died or were too 
sick to remain on the list.
Survival rates varied among the four renal 
function patterns. “We demonstrated that those with an acute worsening of their 
renal function (ie, AKI or AKI on CKD) were at significantly higher risk of 
waitlist mortality than both those with stable CKD and those with normal renal 
function, even after controlling for final MELD-Na score,” the investigators 
summarized.
“We hypothesize that the mechanism by which renal function 
patterns have a varying impact on survival in patients with decompensated 
cirrhosis is related to the etiology of the renal dysfunction,” they continued. 
Patients with AKI or a combination of AKI with CKD, for example, may have 
experienced infection, bleeding, or some other type of event that could have 
increased their mortality risk.
“This suggests that incorporating the pattern 
of renal function could provide an opportunity to better prognosticate risk of 
mortality in the patients with cirrhosis who are the sickest,” the researchers 
concluded. Next steps are to focus on incorporating renal function patterns into 
the MELD-Na score to optimize its accuracy.
The importance of measuring renal 
function effectively is an important takeaway of this study, Uchenna Agbim, MD 
and Sumeet Asrani, MD, wrote in a related editorial. “All serum creatinine-based 
equations overestimate GFR in the presence of renal dysfunction. Furthermore, 
several equations assume a stable GFR, which is not often the case in cirrhotic 
patients on the waiting list. Risk stratification remains paramount, requiring 
continual enhancement of tools,” wrote Agbim and Asrani.
Cullaro agreed that 
all calculations of GFR assume static renal function, which is not often the 
case. “In fact, in the kidney literature there is a description of kinetic GFR 
which incorporates rates of change that may be warranted to investigate in 
patients with end-stage liver disease.”
Future research should focus on more 
effective use of existing biomarkers and identifying better AKI biomarkers to 
assess risk and patients’ renal status, suggested the editorialists. “There may 
be differential effects on morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic patients,” they 
wrote. “More importantly, this will drive the development of concerted efforts 
focused on minimizing risk for renal injury and incorporate relevant biomarkers 
into refined predictive models that guide clinical management and allocation 
guidelines to truly identify patients at highest risk.”