Renal function patterns matter when it comes to mortality in cirrhosis patients awaiting liver transplant.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) alone, or in combination with chronic
kidney disease (CK), significantly increases mortality risk in cirrhotic
patients waiting for a liver transplant. A study published in Clinical
Gastroenterology and Hepatology underscores the importance of assessing renal
function patterns to improve risk profiles in these patients, setting the stage
to investigate more efficient biomarkers on kidney injury.
Half of all
patients with cirrhosis that develop renal failure die within 30 days. “However,
renal dysfunction in the context of cirrhosis arises from a broad spectrum of
pathologies,” including AKI or CKD. Whether these two conditions affect survival
equally, is not well known, wrote the investigators.
The researchers sought
answers in a 90-day retrospective study of more than 22,000 adult patients on
the liver transplant list with the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ
Procurement and Transplantation Network. On average, these patients had spent
approximately 1.6 years on the transplantation list and about 5 years
participating in renal function assessments.
The investigators assigned
patients to four groups based on the following renal function patterns:
AKI:
an increase in serum creatinine by ≥0.3 mg/dL or ≥50% in the last 7 days or
<72 days of hemodialysis;
CKD: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)
<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for 90 days with final eGFR of ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or ≥72
days of hemodialysis;
AKI on CKD: meeting both AKI and CKD definitions;
and
7 Normal renal function: meeting neither definition.
Patients’ serum
creatinine and eGFR had been tracked serially while they were on the time the
transplant list. The researchers used the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology
Collaboration creatinine-based (CKD-EPIcr) equation to calculate eGFR. This
formula was chosen because “some cirrhosis literature shows that it most closely
approximates GFR in patients with liver disease,” lead study author Giuseppe
Cullaro, MD, MAS, a transplant hepatology fellow at New York Presbyterian
Hospital, told CLN Stat.
To establish any associations between transplant
waitlist mortality and renal dysfunction, the investigators performed competing
risk analyses, adjusting for confounders using the model for end-stage liver
disease sodium (MELD-Na) scores. Among 22,680 patients on the waitlist, 13% and
31% had episodes of AKI and CKD, respectively. About 29% either died or were too
sick to remain on the list.
Survival rates varied among the four renal
function patterns. “We demonstrated that those with an acute worsening of their
renal function (ie, AKI or AKI on CKD) were at significantly higher risk of
waitlist mortality than both those with stable CKD and those with normal renal
function, even after controlling for final MELD-Na score,” the investigators
summarized.
“We hypothesize that the mechanism by which renal function
patterns have a varying impact on survival in patients with decompensated
cirrhosis is related to the etiology of the renal dysfunction,” they continued.
Patients with AKI or a combination of AKI with CKD, for example, may have
experienced infection, bleeding, or some other type of event that could have
increased their mortality risk.
“This suggests that incorporating the pattern
of renal function could provide an opportunity to better prognosticate risk of
mortality in the patients with cirrhosis who are the sickest,” the researchers
concluded. Next steps are to focus on incorporating renal function patterns into
the MELD-Na score to optimize its accuracy.
The importance of measuring renal
function effectively is an important takeaway of this study, Uchenna Agbim, MD
and Sumeet Asrani, MD, wrote in a related editorial. “All serum creatinine-based
equations overestimate GFR in the presence of renal dysfunction. Furthermore,
several equations assume a stable GFR, which is not often the case in cirrhotic
patients on the waiting list. Risk stratification remains paramount, requiring
continual enhancement of tools,” wrote Agbim and Asrani.
Cullaro agreed that
all calculations of GFR assume static renal function, which is not often the
case. “In fact, in the kidney literature there is a description of kinetic GFR
which incorporates rates of change that may be warranted to investigate in
patients with end-stage liver disease.”
Future research should focus on more
effective use of existing biomarkers and identifying better AKI biomarkers to
assess risk and patients’ renal status, suggested the editorialists. “There may
be differential effects on morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic patients,” they
wrote. “More importantly, this will drive the development of concerted efforts
focused on minimizing risk for renal injury and incorporate relevant biomarkers
into refined predictive models that guide clinical management and allocation
guidelines to truly identify patients at highest risk.”