Patients with diabetes mellitus, especially those who develop 
the disease when young and consequently live with it for a long time and who 
have comorbid conditions, are at elevated risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). 
To guide clinicians on preventing and managing the effects of diabetes on the 
cardiovascular system, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European 
Association for the Study of Diabetes have issued new CVD risk factor categories 
and lipid targets while recommending specific testing protocols to assess for 
CVD risk. Several articles in the European Heart Journal describe these 
recommendations, including a list of “10 commandments” that highlight the 
guidelines’ main points.
Diabetes, in comparison with other CVD risk factors 
such as smoking, dyslipidemia, and hypertension “adds a more sinister item to 
the presentation of cardiovascular diseases, with poorer prognosis,” wrote 
guideline author Victor Aboyans, MD, PhD, FESC in his summary of the 
recommendations. The document comes at a timely moment, with the release of 
heart-friendly new agents such as peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and 
sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors. Cardiologists in turn, have 
become more proactive in their treatment of diabetic patients.
In wake of the 
growing epidemic of diabetes and prediabetes, “all clinical cardiologists, as 
well as those specialized in any subspecialty in cardiology, must be aware of 
these very updated guidelines,” Aboyans suggested.
He and his colleagues 
recommended that all patients presenting with CVD undergo fasting blood glucose 
and HbA1c to exclude for diabetes. These tests are good candidates because 
they’re simple and inexpensive and provide good pickup without inconveniencing 
patients, explained Peter Grant, MD, FMedSci, corresponding author of the 
guidelines and professor of medicine at the University of Leeds UK. If tests are 
inconclusive, clinicians should follow up with an oral glucose tolerance test 
(OGTT).
OGTT should only be used if there is a strong suspicion of impaired 
glucose tolerance in the presence of normal fasting tests, Grant 
said.
Several chapters address CVD risk factors in diabetic patients, 
outlining the benefits and limitations of various tests. Guideline authors 
established several tiers of CVD risk in diabetes patients. Those who have had 
type 2 diabetes for more than 2 decades, already have CVD or end-target organ 
damage classify as “very high” risk. Additionally, individuals who have had 
diabetes for more than 10 years should be considered at high risk, while others 
who don’t fit into these higher risk categories have a moderate risk, according 
to Aboyans. 
To identify patients at risk for developing CVD and/or renal 
dysfunction, clinicians should routinely assess for microalbuminuria, “the only 
marker recommended for all diabetes patients,” Aboyans wrote. If clinicians 
suspect CVD, or if patients have both diabetes and hypertension, the authors 
recommended a resting electrocardiogram. Coronary calcium score, ankle-brachial 
index, peripheral vascular ultrasound, and cardiac function imaging tests are 
suitable for refining diabetes risk in moderate or high-risk cases, or assessing 
for structural heart disease. Novel biomarkers, however, should not be used to 
assess for CVD risk. As a general rule, the data just isn’t there to support 
their use. “This may change with time,” Grant told CLN Stat.
Clinicians 
should take steps to manage cardiovascular risk factors such as blood pressure 
(BP), glycemic control, lipids, and antiplatelet agents in individual 
patients.
The panelists modified lipid targets to reflect the new risk 
categories in the guidelines. For moderate, high-, and very high-risk patients, 
they set low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) thresholds of 100 mg/dL, 70 
mg/dL, and 55 mg/dL, respectively. For the high- and very high-risk categories, 
an LDL-C reduction of at least 50% should take place.