Combining multi-omics and wisdom of crowds analysis 
investigators identify 28 biomarkers indicative of stress disorder in combat 
veterans.
A multi-omics analysis from the PTSD Systems Biology 
Consortium suggests that a set of 28 biomarkers might aid in diagnosing 
post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in war veterans.
A number of 
factors—stigma, biases in self-disclosure of symptoms and limitations associated 
with identifying at-risk individuals—make it a challenge to diagnose PTSD in 
veterans and active duty soldiers, senior study author Charles Marmar, MD, 
director of the PTSD Research Program at NYU Langone Health, told CLN Stat. 
“Prior studies suggest that PTSD may be a systemic illness, affecting not just 
the brain but the entire body. Therefore, disease signals likely span multiple 
biological domains, including genes, proteins, cells, tissues, and 
organism-level physiological changes,” Marmar and his colleagues wrote in 
Molecular Psychiatry. Previous studies had some success in identifying 
predictive and diagnostic markers but involved smaller cohorts and a narrower 
focus with respect to molecular data.
To seek out PTSD-specific biomarker 
candidates, investigators recruited Operation Enduring Freedom  and/or Operation 
Iraqi Freedom male veterans spanning ages 20-60, who met criteria for 
PTSD-positive or PTSD-negative groups. They identified 1 million molecular, 
cellular, physiological, and clinical features from these veterans, who were 
grouped into discovery, recall, and validation cohorts. The first group, a 
discovery cohort of 83 individuals with warzone-related PTSD and 82 
warzone-exposed control veterans, was used to identify 343 candidate 
biomarkers.
The investigators employed a “wisdom of crowds” method of data 
analysis, an approach often used in financial modeling. Hypothesis, hybrid, and 
other approaches helped identify the candidate markers from a larger pool of 
measured blood analytes. In each participant, the researchers assayed for 
blood-based analytes not only using routine clinical lab panels but also 
assessing DNA methylation, proteomics, metabolomics, miRNAs, small molecule, and 
endocrine markers. In another step, they recorded the participants’ 
physiological measures and computed nonlinear marker combinations.
Using data 
from recalled participants and a two-stage down-selection process, they further 
narrowed their panel to 28 final robust and diverse candidate biomarkers for 
diagnosing PTSD, which cover five of the six molecular data types the 
researchers were interrogating, including DNA methylation, physiology, miRNA, 
clinical lab measures, and metabolites. Several biomarkers, such as elevated 
heart rate and decreased level of coagulation factors, had been associated with 
PTSD in prior studies. Others have a link to anxiety, major depressive disorder 
(MDD), and comorbid conditions such as insulin resistance, platelet volume, 
PDE9A expression, and alterations in the SHANK2 gene. The investigators called 
out the miRNAs that made the panel, noting that they “reflect the diverse 
pathology and comorbidities present in PTSD populations, including connections 
to metabolic diseases and cardiovascular conditions.”
Another independent 
cohort that validated the 28 features found that 35% of PTSD cases met criteria 
for MDD. Overall, the 28 biomarkers predicted a PTSD diagnosis in this cohort 
with 81% accuracy, 85% sensitivity, and 77% specificity. These findings point to 
the promise of a blood-based screening or diagnostic tool for PTSD, according to 
Marmar. 
PTSD has often been linked to conditions such as depression, 
anxiety, alcoholism, substance abuse, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. In 
the investigators’ view, “a robust PTSD biomarker panel should be specific to 
PTSD and not any of these or other comorbidities, and able to detect PTSD in 
both the presence and absence of these comorbid conditions,”—a goal that will 
require further study.
Marmar told CLN Stat he and his colleagues plan to 
expand upon these findings by examining other groups such as a larger male 
veteran cohort, as well as female veterans and civilian victims of trauma. “We 
also are going to work closely with the Food and Drug Administration to 
determine if what we have discovered in this study can have some early 
application to the clinical setting,” he added.
The goal is to make it easier 
and more objective for physicians to diagnose PTSD so that treatment can be 
administered earlier when it has its greatest effectiveness, Marmar 
said.
Another genome-wide association study found a strong genetic tie to 
PTSD, reporting that its heritability behaves in a manner similar to other forms 
of mental illness. Examining a large and diverse cohort of 200,000 individuals, 
researchers from the University of California San Diego School of Medicine and 
institutions with the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium found that heritability 
accounts for 5% to up to 20% of PTSD risk variability following trauma. The 
trial uncovered six loci with a strong link to PTSD risk. Three of the six were 
only found in men: Two were associated with European ancestry and one in African 
ancestry.
Looking at genetic associations between PTSD and 235 other 
disorders, behaviors, and physical traits, the researchers discovered that PTSD 
overlaps with 21 disorders, including depression, schizophrenia, neuroticism, 
insomnia, asthma, and coronary artery disease. “Similar to other mental 
disorders, the genetic contribution to PTSD correlates with that for many other 
traits," said senior author Karestan Koenen, PhD, associate member of the 
Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research at the Broad Institute of MIT and 
Harvard in a statement. “Further research is needed to determine what this 
means—whether some of the same genes that influence risk for PTSD also influence 
risk for other diseases like, for example, depression.”